FAQ: Water and Sewer Rates
Click on a question to view the answer.
How much have water and sewer rates increased and why?
Water rates increased 9.25 percent in July 2018. For in-town customers, the increase was from $8.07 to $8.82 per 1,000 gallons. For the average residential customer using 3,864 gallons per month, this equates to a $2.90 increase per month. Out‐of‐town rates increased from $15.74 to $17.20 per 1,000 gallons, or $5.64 per month for the average customer. Water rates were last raised in July 2012.
Sewer rates increased 7.5 percent in July 2018. For in-town customers, the increase was from $12.13 to $13.04 per 1,000 gallons. For the average residence, this equates to a $3.52 increase per month. Out‐of‐town rates increased from $23.65 to $25.42 per 1,000 gallons, or $6.84 per month for the average customer. Sewer rates were last raised in July 2015.
Primary reasons for the increases are construction of the West Fork Eno Reservoir expansion, loss of Efland-Cheeks sewer customers to Mebane and construction of a new sewer main at South Churton Street and Orange Grove Road.
What other fees have changed and why?
Water and sewer capital facilities fees changed in July 2018. These fees are not charged to current customers. They are charged one time and only to new customers, developers or builders to recover a proportional share of capital costs incurred to provide service availability and capacity. Fees for water increased by 29.1 percent, from $2,993 to $3,864, primarily due to expansion of the West Fork Eno Reservoir. Fees for sewer decreased 7 percent from $3,488 to $3,243.
For detailed explanations on how these fees have changed depending on meter size, please see the report from Raftelis Financial Consulting below. State law requires that all water and sewer systems update their system development fee charges through an engineering or similar analysis to ensure fees are being fairly assessed.
How do our water and sewer rates compare with other communities?
Comparing rates is not simple, as the cost of service for each utility is based on a number of diverse factors. However, across the state, a number of systems have higher rates and many systems with lower rates are within larger communities. These larger communities have a greater customer base over which the cost of service can be distributed.
The UNC School of Government's Environmental Finance Center and the N.C. League of Municipalities provide annual research to allow customers to compare Hillsborough’s rates with other water and sewer systems that are in the same basin or regional council of governments or that have similar characteristics.
Below are some characteristics for Hillsborough:
- Within the Upper Neuse River watershed.
- Within the Falls Lake watershed.
- Affected by wastewater treatment mandates under Falls Lake Rules, state mandates to protect and restore the water quality of Falls Lake.
- Part of the Triangle J Council of Governments, a seven-county region.
- Charges for a minimum usage of 2,500 gallons each billing cycle. Additional use is billed per 1,000 gallons.
- Charges out-of-town customers a rate that is 1.95 times the rate for in-town customers.
- Serves about 14,000 people through about 5,600 water connections.
- Average residential customer use is 3,864 gallons of water per month.
In the Upper Neuse River watershed, Hillsborough’s rates per 4,000 gallons in January 2018 were:
- Water rates — higher than the median by $4.93 for in-town customers and by $14.96 for out-of-town customers
- Sewer rates — higher than the median by $6.27 for in-town customers and by $25.63 for out-of-town customers
Among the Triangle J Council of Governments, Hillsborough’s rates per 4,000 gallons in January 2018 were:
- Water rates — higher than the median by $2.86 for in-town customers and by $13.02 for out-of-town customers
- Sewer rates — higher than the median by $11.96 for in-town customers and by $32.24 for out-of-town customers
Why are our rates higher than those of some surrounding communities?
Every community has different conditions that affect the ability to provide safe and reliable water and sewer service. The primary reasons that Hillsborough’s water rates are higher than those of some surrounding communities are:
Lack of a plentiful and easy-to-access water supply
The Eno River does not provide a large volume of water as we are located close to the river’s headwaters — beginning. The drainage basin that feeds into Hillsborough’s waterways also is relatively small. In addition, Hillsborough is located too far from larger systems or in a different river basin than larger systems to make absorption into those systems a reasonable solution. An evaluation of partnering with the City of Durham water system found the costs to be too expensive, and Hillsborough is in a different river basin than the Carrboro-Chapel Hill area, which has its water provided by the Orange Water and Sewer Authority.
To address water capacity needs — both due to a history of droughts and to accommodate expected growth to the area — the town built a reservoir in the late 1990s and started expanding the reservoir in 2018. The debt on the reservoir construction makes up a large portion of the expenses related to the water portion of customers’ bills.
State-mandated rules to protect and restore the water quality of Falls Lake
Hillsborough is required to treat its wastewater at higher and more expensive standards than other sewer systems because of its location. The town is located within a watershed that drains into Falls Lake, which is on the EPA’s list of impaired waters and has been designated nutrient-sensitive by the N.C. Division of Water Resources. To protect and restore the lake’s water quality, the state created the Falls Lake Rules, which includes stringent rules for the release of treated wastewater. The wastewater rules affect the Town of Hillsborough, the North Durham Wastewater Reclamation Facility and the South Granville Water and Sewer Authority. They are said to be the nation’s strictest limits on treated wastewater. The first stage of the wastewater discharge rules went into effect in 2016, and the second stage is expected in 2036.
In 2014, Hillsborough completed upgrades to its wastewater treatment plant in part to meet the Stage 1 wastewater rule. The debt on the plant upgrades makes up a large portion of the expenses related to the sewer portion of customers’ bills. Additional upgrades to the Wastewater Treatment Plant likely will be required to meet the Stage 2 wastewater rules.
Large number of sewage pump stations
Hillsborough has more pump stations than a typical municipality because of its terrain and likely because the infrastructure was preferred decades ago due to its low upfront costs. These stations help sewage flow past an elevated area, such as a hill, by pumping or lifting the sewage from a lower to higher elevation. Once past the elevated point, the sewage can flow again via gravity. Pump stations are expensive to operate and require a large amount of staff time. In addition, failures can result in sanitary sewer overflows and fines from the state. Gravity is the most cost-effective way to transport water and wastewater.
Small size of utilities system
Because Hillsborough operates a small utilities system, it does not benefit from the economies of scale of a larger system that can spread the costs of operations among more customers.
In addition, because small towns deal with smaller amounts of gross funds, they need larger savings levels to be fiscally sound and to satisfy criteria established by bond rating agencies that assess the town’s creditworthiness. A reasonable savings level — also called “fund balance” or “retained earnings” — for a utility is critical to ensure the town does not have cash flow problems and can handle unexpected revenue shortfalls, expenditure overruns and emergencies. Town policy recommends maintaining an undesignated fund balance of 20 to 60 percent of annual operating expenditures.
Commitment to care for the town’s utilities system, customers and environment
Water and sewer services are expensive to provide. When it comes to maintaining its drinking and wastewater infrastructure, the United States fails as a whole, earning respective grades of D and D+ in the 2017 Infrastructure Report Card from the American Society of Civil Engineers. The grades are slightly better in North Carolina — with a C+ for drinking water infrastructure and a C for wastewater infrastructure.
The Town of Hillsborough strives to do better. Our operations approach includes taking care of what we have. Your Hillsborough water and sewer bill reflects your contribution to the labor and the physical infrastructure required to have clean, accessible water when you want it and to have wastewater removed when desired and safely returned to the environment. The town does not make a profit from providing water and sewer service nor does it use water and sewer revenue for purposes other than the operation, maintenance and improvement of the town’s water and sewer system.
Where does the money we pay for water and sewer service go?
Water and sewer payments cover the costs of providing the utility service, which includes the operation, maintenance and improvements of the system. The majority of revenue from water and sewer payments funds:
- Water and sewer operations
- Employees who provide the services
- Debt payments for water and sewer capital projects
Data for the last fiscal year is still being finalized. In Fiscal Year 2016-17, the breakdown for water and sewer expenses was:
- 17.5 percent to operations
- 48 percent to personnel services
- 34.2 percent to debt service
Why are out-of-town fees higher than in-town fees?
Out-of-town water and sewer fees are higher than in-town fees due to:
Cost of service
Customers located farther away from the town’s core usually are more expensive to serve on average because of lower densities and greater distances. Outlying areas generally are less densely populated than areas within the town, which involves a greater average expense in maintaining and serving the system per foot of pipe. The operations, maintenance, pumping of water and sewer, and reading of meters can be more costly in areas outside of town, primarily due to additional distance and travel time from the town’s water or wastewater treatment plants.
When the town provides water and sewer service by request to developments outside of its limits, it loses some of its capacity to attract the type of development that would improve its tax base, help improve the economies of scale in providing services, and potentially ease the tax burden on existing citizens. Charging a higher rate to out-of-town customers is a way to recoup some of the potential lost tax revenue that the town sacrifices by allocating part of its water and sewer resources to outside customers. Lower in-town fees also can make annexation more desirable in areas that already have water and sewer service.
As owners of the town’s water and sewer system, in-town customers bear more of the investment risks of owning and operating a utility. When voter-approved general obligation bonds are issued to finance large projects, such as the reservoir’s first phase, the town pledges its full faith and the credit of its taxing power as collateral to ensure the debt will be repaid.
In-town customers bear more of the burden of financing and facilitating the water and sewer system’s operations through their local government, including through paying municipal property taxes. For in-town customers, both their water and sewer payments as well as their municipal property taxes help pay for positions and resources that support the water and sewer operations, including Human Resources personnel and information technology. Through their tax dollars, in-town customers also subsidize the use of Hillsborough services by out-of-town customers who live near the town’s corporate limits, including police protection when inside town limits; recreation facilities, such as Gold Park, Kings Highway Park and the Riverwalk greenway; and streets.